Comparison of different methods for the swimming aerobic capacity evaluation

This study compared velocity (v) and bioenergetical factors using different methods applied for the swimming aerobic capacity evaluation. Ten elite female swimmers (17.6 ± 1.9 years, 1.70 ± 0.05 m, and 61.3 ± 5.8 kg) performed an intermittent incremental velocity protocol until voluntary exhaustion to determine the v associated with the individual anaerobic threshold (IAnT), ventilatory threshold (VT), heart rate threshold (HRT), lactate threshold fixed in 3.5 mmol/L (LT3.5), and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Two-to-three 30-minute submaximal constant tests for the v assessment at maximal lactate steady state (MLSS). The v, gas exchange, heart rate, and blood lactate concentration variables were monitored in all tests. The values of all parameters at the v corresponding to MLSS, IAnT, VT, and HRT were similar (p = 0.05), with high agreement (r 2 > 0.400), except for carbon dioxide (VCO2) that was higher for MLSS compared with VT (p = 0.05). However, the v at LT3.5 was higher when compared with other methods for v and bioenergetical factors. It is suggested that IAnT, VT, and HRT methods are better predictors of the intensity corresponding to the commonly accepted gold-standard method (i.e., MLSS) for the aerobic capacity evaluation compared with LT3.5.
© Copyright 2018 The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. National Strength & Conditioning Association. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:biological and medical sciences endurance sports
Published in:The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Language:English
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2018/12000/Comparison_of_Different_Methods_for_the_Swimming.30.aspx
Volume:32
Issue:12
Pages:3542-3551
Document types:article
Level:advanced