Is there evidence for an association between changes in training load and running-related injuries? A systematic review

Background: Sudden changes (increases and decreases) in training load have been suggested to play a key role in the development of running-related injuries. However, the compiled evidence for an association between change in training load and running-related injury does not exist. Purpose: The purpose of the present systematic review was to compile the evidence from original articles examining the association between changes in training load and running-related injuries. Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: Four databases (Pubmed/Medline, SPORTDiscus, Embase, and Scopus) were systematically searched. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles independently. Articles were included if i) the study design was a randomized trial, a prospective cohort study, a cross-sectional study or a case-control study, ii) participants were runners between 18-65 years, and iii) specific information on changes in training load was provided. Methodological quality of included articles was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and the PEDro rating scale. Results: Four articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria of which three found an association between increases in training load and an increased risk of running-related injuries: This association was shown by an increased injury risk amongst runners: i) if they recently had performed one or more changes in either velocity and/or distance and/or frequency compared with the non-injured runners (p = 0.037), ii) increasing their average weekly running distance by more than 30% compared to an increase less than 10% (Hazard Ratio? = ?1.59 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.96; 2.66)), iii) increasing their total running distance significantly more the week before the injury origin compared with other weeks (mean difference: 86%; 95% Confidence Interval: 12%; 159%, p = 0.026). However, no difference was found between a 10% and a 24% average increase in weekly volume (HR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6; 1.3). Conclusion: Very limited evidence exists supporting that a sudden change in training load is associated with increased risk of running-related injury.
© Copyright 2018 International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy (AASPT). All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:endurance sports biological and medical sciences
Published in:International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Language:English
Published: 2018
Online Access:https://spts.org/docs/default-source/v13n6/ijspt-13_6-01-damstead_abs.pdf?sfvrsn=af2e964_2
Volume:13
Issue:6
Pages:931-942
Document types:article
Level:advanced