Postma, D. B. W., Smith, J, Pepping, G.-J, van Andel, S. & Zaal, F. T. J. M. (2017). When a fly ball Is out of reach: Catchability judgments are not based on optical acceleration cancelation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 , 535. Zugriff am 11.04.2017 unter https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00535
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Postma, D. B. W., Smith, J., Pepping, G., van Andel, S., & Zaal, F. T. J. M. (2017). When a fly ball Is out of reach: Catchability judgments are not based on optical acceleration cancelation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 535.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Postma, D. B. W., J. Smith, G.-J Pepping, S. van Andel, und F. T. J. M. Zaal. "When a Fly Ball Is Out of Reach: Catchability Judgments Are Not Based on Optical Acceleration Cancelation." Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017): 535.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Postma, D. B. W., et al. "When a Fly Ball Is Out of Reach: Catchability Judgments Are Not Based on Optical Acceleration Cancelation." Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, 2017, p. 535.