Run training vs cross training: Influence of increased training on running economy, foot impact shock, and run performance
After 30 days of normal training, male runners (N = 11) were subjected to 14 days of reduced training (80% of normal). Ss then ran on 10 consecutive days (100% of normal) as well as performing 8 additional morning workouts of the same volume and intensity. The morning sessions were performed on a treadmill or cycle ergometer so that a comparison between specific training and cross-training could be made. Running economy, foot impact shock, and lactate were assessed during a submaximal treadmill run before and after the 10-day period. Following the submaximal assessment, a 5 km time trial on the treadmill was performed.
After cross-training VO2max was significantly higher than after specific run-training indicating a detrimental effect. No significant changes occurred in run performance, resting heart rate, or blood pressure. Both training programs had similar effects on other measures: RER, carbohydrate oxidation, and lactate were significantly lower, and foot impact was significantly higher.
Implication: Cross-training (cycling) in periods of increased run-training loads was detrimental to running economy and is not a beneficial training alternative.
© Copyright 1995 International Journal of Sports Medicine. Thieme. All rights reserved.
| Subjects: | |
|---|---|
| Notations: | endurance sports |
| Published in: | International Journal of Sports Medicine |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
1995
|
| Online Access: | https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-2007-972988 |
| Volume: | 16 |
| Issue: | 3 |
| Pages: | 180-184 |
| Document types: | article |
| Level: | advanced |