Search Results - Significance

Javaloyes, A., Sánchez-Jiménez, J. L., Peña-González, I., Moya-Ramón, M., Mateo-March, M. “…Top-5 cyclists maintained stable PO and torque beyond 60 kJ·kg-1, whereas the top-30 group showed significant declines (p < 0.001). Torque was strongly correlated with PO (r = 0.6-0.9, p < 0.001), while cadence showed a weaker correlation (r = 0.1-0.5). …”

Stachowicz, A., Keska, A., Milde, K., Stachowicz, M. “…However, it also seems interesting to find out which values of anthropometric indices showing a significant relationship with health risk characterise the top athletes, especially in popular sports. …”

Shunfang Liu, Jingling Dai, Pengpeng Gou & Menglong Lin “…Results After excluding two studies that contributed substantial heterogeneity, core stability training demonstrated a moderate and statistically significant effect on swimming performance (SMD = -0.71, 95% CI: -0.91 to -0.51, p < 0.00001), with low residual heterogeneity (I2 = 21%). …”

Andronikos, G., Westbury, T., Souglis, A., Travlos, A., Martindale, R. J. “…In addition, a coaching team was embedded utilizing a multidisciplinary approach, and significant others were actively incorporated in the development process. …”

Rysman, J. F., Cohen, C., Sachet, I., Brunet, E., Baré, A., Baugé, G., Prudhomme, A., Clanet, C. “…Yet measuring strategy using quantitative evidence remains a significant challenge. To overcome this hurdle, we adopted a data-driven approach by analysing videos of 1,500 matches in World and European championships, World Cup and Olympic Games from 2018 to 2024. …”

Jauch, E., Terry, K., Hoogendyk, D., Campbell, S. “…RESULTS: Baseline functionality scores significantly decreased within the CON group (p=0.083) while they improved without statistical significance within the INT group (p=0.382). …”

Nimmo, B, Torres, M, Johnson, E C. “…RESULTS: In P1, recovery HR significantly decreased across sessions (p = 0.017). …”

Ferreras, D. E., Martinez, A. I., Billings, C. M., Pazdur, H. C., Barandino, A. H. A., Hernandez, R., Rodriguez, T., Hill, C. R., Karlinsky, A., Ng, J. “…Mean HR during exercise was also not different between sessions (indoors: 169 ± 17 beats/min; outdoors: 172 ± 12 beats/min; t(7) = -1.00, p = 0.349). There was no significant correlation between pre-exercise USG and session HR for either session (indoors: r = -0.121, p = 0.776; outdoors: r = 0.447, p = 0.267). …”

Mateo-March, M., Peña-González, I., Moya-Ramón, M., Javaloyes, A. “…Physiological variables, including CP, improved significantly in competitive periods compared to training periods (p <= 0.01). …”

López-Plaza, D., Alacid, F., Abellán-Aynés, O., Quero-Calero, C. D. “…Purpose At the age of menarche, there is a significant increase in the secretion of sex hormones, affecting physical and morphological growth. …”

Pirlot, T., Baron, B., Scholler, V., Grappe, F., Pageaux, B., Groslambert, A. “…The professionals also reported a greater perceived effort (6.0 [2.7] vs 5.1 [2.3], P = .023, d = -0.67). No significant differences were found for heart rate, respiratory frequency, or neural efficiency. …”

Baldyka, J., Kopiczko, A. “…R2 = .78). BMC TR was significantly affected by muscle mass (kg) (adj. R2 = .75). …”

Sprenger, H. M. L., van Biljouw, T., Bentley, D. J. “…In Part 2 (n = 7), NaHCO3 significantly elevated pre- and post-performance pH (7.46 ± 0.02 vs. 7.37 ± 0.01; 7.34 ± 0.02 vs. 7.26 ± 0.03), HCO3- (29.5 ± 0.9 vs. 22.4 ± 0.4 mmol/L; 21.5 ± 1.2 vs. 15.7 ± 1.5 mmol/L), and base excess (5.9 ± 0.6 vs. -2.9 ± 0.5 mmol/L; -4.3 ± 0.8 vs. -10.3 ± 1.1 mmol/L) compared to the placebo (all p < 0.05, g = 3.99-14.93). …”

Garcia-Atutxa, I., Dudagoitia Barrio, E., Villanueva-Flores, F. “…Introduction: In professional cycling, the technical characteristics of race stages significantly influence group dynamics and performance variability among competitors. …”

Peter, A., Hegyi, A., Kóbor, I., Gyebnár, G., Kovács, B. “…Considering muscle volume, largest anatomical cross-sectional area and muscle length, we found no significant differences between sprinters and distance runners, and the shape of the muscle was also similar between groups. …”

Yu, S., Zhou, S., Peng, D., Jie, D. “…Results: The CT group showed significantly greater improvements in running economy at all speeds (p < 0.001) compared to the RT group. …”

Hsu, C., Schon, J., Genovese, T., McInnis, K. “…Swimmers demonstrated a positive tilt test (defined as no clear end point) at significantly higher rates than runners). Swimmers demonstrated significantly greater ankle ROM than runner controls in plantarflexion, inversion in neutral, inversion in plantarflexion, eversion in neutral, and eversion in plantarflexion (t=-6.770, P<0.001; t=-4.140, P<0.001; t=-5.293, P<0.001; t=-2.153, P=0.017; t=-3.351, P<0.001). …”

Mueller, T. S. “…The regression "upset if unable to participate," F(5, 365) = 16.90, p < .001, R2 = .019, view Cognitive Involvement (t = 4.54, p < .001), Disharmony (t = 2.96, p = .003), and Social Identity (t = 2.41, p = .016) as significant predictors. "Lone Wolf" isolationist runners were highly masculine and motivated by emotional involvement. …”

Barsumyan, A., Soost, C., Shyla, R., Graw, J. A., Bliemel, C., Burchard, R. “…No significant correlations were found between better durability and VO2 max or relative FTP. …”

Rezaei, H., Gheitasi, M., Hosseini, S. M. “…However, no significant differences were found in performance measures such as swim record (P >.386) and stroke rate (P >.630). …”