Haapasalo, H, Kontulainen, S, Sievanen, H, Kannus, P, Jarvinen, M & Vuori, I. (2000). Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: A peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone, 27 (3), 351-357. Zugriff am 17.11.2000 unter https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00331-8
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Haapasalo, H., Kontulainen, S., Sievanen, H., Kannus, P., Jarvinen, M., & Vuori, I. (2000). Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: A peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone, 27(3), 351-357.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Haapasalo, H., S. Kontulainen, H. Sievanen, P. Kannus, M. Jarvinen, und I. Vuori. "Exercise-induced Bone Gain Is Due to Enlargement in Bone Size Without a Change in Volumetric Bone Density: A Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Study of the Upper Arms of Male Tennis Players." Bone 27, no. 3 (2000): 351-357.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Haapasalo, H., et al. "Exercise-induced Bone Gain Is Due to Enlargement in Bone Size Without a Change in Volumetric Bone Density: A Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Study of the Upper Arms of Male Tennis Players." Bone, vol. 27, no. 3, 2000, pp. 351-357.