Search Results - Condition

Zhou, C., Cai, Y., Li, K., Zhang, X., Tang, C. “…In high-difficulty conditions, athletes demonstrated more efficient visual strategies, such as shorter fixation times and reduced saccade paths. …”

Witte, K., Pastel, S., Merker, S., Buerger, D. “…For this purpose, three key issues were defined, which were addressed in four own research studies: (1) Influence of an HMD on the execution of gymnastic elements on a beam, (2) Comparison of movement execution under real conditions and in the virtual environment with and without visualized body segments, and (3) Possibility of using a virtual beam with simulated height. …”

Wehovszky, V., Nagykáldi, C., Kalmár, Z., Ökrös, C. “…For gymnasts, key competencies included physical condition, work ability, activity, competition attitude, performance expectation, and satisfaction. …”

Dudoniene, V., Rimdeikiene, I., Lapinskas, E. “…Additionally, for both legs, the No KinT condition showed superior performance relative to the KinT AA condition (p < 0.05). …”

Leite, I., Goethel, M., Gómez-Landero, L. A., Ávila-Carvalho, L., Vilas-Boas, J. P., Mochizuki, L., Conceição, F. “…IMU and motion capture data were collected synchronously in laboratory conditions while acrobatic gymnasts performed two acrobatic skills: a back tucked somersault (BTS) and a back straight somersault (BSS). …”

Ðordevic, D., Vodicar, J., Kreft, R., Kolar, E., Paunovic, M., Velickovic, S., Marinšek, M. “…Given the potential for misinterpretation of body composition metrics, a holistic approach to athletic conditioning is recommended. However, the study`s limitations, including the small sample size and cross-sectional design-warrant cautious interpretation. …”

Leite, I., Mochizuki, L., Gómez-Landero, L. A., Ávila Carvalho, L., Vilas-Boas, J. P., Goethel, M., Conceição, F. “…Granger causality results indicate variations in predictive behaviour across conditions, particularly concerning the time frame and the effect of the task for the top gymnast, but did not provide evidence of causality. …”

Kraemer, W. J., Vatne, E. A., Saenz, C., Jones, P. C., Carpenter, T. J., Cencer, D. A. Jr, Enchelmeyer, K. E., Pulvermacher, K. R., Quebedeaux, C. K., Vatne, M. R., Hagen, J. A. “…The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research…”

Schärer, C., Yusof, E., Capelli, C. Subjects: “…physical conditioning ability…”

Williams, E. R., Lloyd, R. S., Moeskops, S., Pedley, J. S. “…Strength and Conditioning Journal…”

“…Published online February 12, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0458 In parts A and B of Figure 3, the high-load (HL) and low-load (LL) conditioning-activity protocols were incorrectly labeled; specifically, HL was identified as LL and vice versa. …”

Rosaci, G., Nigro, F., Cortesi, M., Ciacci, S., Bartolomei, S., Fantozzi, S. “…The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research…”

Udalova M. A. “…Objective of the study was to creation of assessment exercises to gauge the physical condition of gymnasts participating in team routines. …”

Silva, B., Leite, I., Gomes, C., Sousa, F., Ávila-Carvalho, L. “…Further investigation into physical preparation and optimal conditions for landing execution is essential. Increasing both the quantity and quality of information could equip coaches with more effective tools for practice, ultimately contributing to the advancement of gymnastics.…”

Leite, I., Gómez-Landero, L. A., Vilas-Boas, J. P., Goethel, M., Mochizuki, L., Conceição, F. Subjects: “…physical conditioning ability…”

Buxton, E. L., Hiley, M. J., Yeadon, M. R. “…Protocol 3 was the preferred method for collecting landing forces and resulted in a mean percentage velocity absolute difference of less than 2% for both one-mat and two-mat conditions. This study demonstrates the importance of keeping the landing mats clear of the force platform surroundings during the whole of the landing phase.…”

Yang, C., Shi, L., Lu, Y., Wu, H., Yu, D. “…Jump height significantly decreased by -0.35 cm (ES = -0.14; P = 0.021) at 9 minutes after the control condition. SJs significantly improved jump height by 1.02 cm (ES = 0.36; P = 0.005) at 9 minutes post-exercise compared to the control condition. …”

Dallas, C., Dallas, G., Papazogonopoulou, K., Theodorou, A. “…Nine high-level male artistic gymnasts, who performed the handspring vault under training conditions, volunteered to participate in the study. …”

Leupold, O., Cheng, J., Wimberly, A., Nguyen, J., Tilley, D., Gabbett, T. J., Casey, E. “…After daily training, training load surveys assessed training duration per event (warm-up, vault, bars, beam, floor, strength and conditioning) and session rating of perceived exertion (RPE; 1-10; 10 = hardest) per event. …”

Laroëre, B. M., Land, W. M., Valtr, L., Banátová, K., Mudrák, J., Abdollahipour, R. “…Participants with previous experience in aerobic gymnastics were asked to perform an L-support task for 4 seconds in three attentional focus conditions: internal focus, external focus, and control, with the order counter-balanced across focus conditions. …”