Search Results - Personality and Individual Differences

Wirtz, S., Huynh, M., Smith, M., Webster, K. E., MacMahon, C. “…Thus, this study investigated personality traits as moderators of these interindividual differences. …”

Mazin, V., Cherepiekhina, O., Alibekov, A., Bykov, V. “…The importance of examining differences in nervous system characteristics, personality profiles, and mental reliability between basketball players of the Ukrainian Deaflympics national team who compete for professional clubs (n=6) and those who play only for the national team (n=5). …”

Mizushima, J., Tomura, T. “…First, Job Demands encompassed producing strong results for major competitions in a socio-cultural context distinct from Japan, adapting to local work cultures, and negotiating differences in team members` motivations. Second, Job Resources included the coach`s personal competencies, high levels of work engagement and self-efficacy, and organizational resources such as scientific support and full-time assistant coaches. …”

Patsiaouras, A., Tsetsilas, K., Politi, E., & Charitonidis, K. “…Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two genders of the participating athletes for resilience or for the coping problem strategies. …”

Roux, V., Trouilloud, D. “…A linear growth model and a multiple regression analysis indicated that the evolution of coach-athlete relationship quality was negatively related to athletes` individual injury rate over the season. In addition, latent class growth analyses and ANOVA revealed inter-individual differences in the evolution of this association, indicating that athletes who perceived a deterioration in the relationship with their coach were more often injured during the season. …”

Sandbakk, Ø., Tønnessen, E., Sandbakk, S. B., Losnegard, T., Seiler, S., Haugen, T. “…Background World-class coaches collect training data from their athletes systematically and exhibit an experimental mindset when making individual training adjustments in response to this data and other forms of feedback. …”

Mihaila, I., Popescu, M.-C., Pascual-Fuertes, X., Popescu, D.-C., Stancu, M., Acsinte, A., Ciorba, C. “…In the right and left leg Execution speed test, the differences observed reveal individual adaptations. …”

Yasuyuki, N. “…METHODS: The persons to be analyzed are 2 novice coaches and 2 proficient coaches in the college basketball club. …”

Fusco, A., De Maio, M., Papale, O., Di Rocco, F., Di Fazio, M., Festino, E., Foster, C., Cortis, C. “…RTT consisted of 3-min warm-up with a slope of 1% (fixed for the test), with subsequent speed increase of 1 km/h every 2-min. For the STT, individual target times for each incremental bout were calculated based on the seasonal competitive personal best. …”

Hacques, G., Bourgeais, Q., Campo, M., Seifert, L. “…The decision making of the first attacker was assessed by the decision made (pass, skip pass or cross), the time of possession of the ball, the length of the passes, and the distance to the closest defender at the time of passing. Results Individual and collective motivational goals decreased and increased VAS scores, respectively (mean difference of 1.4 points, p < .001). …”

Keller, S., Manunzio, C., Wahl, P. “…Methods: 23 swimmers or triathletes (12 male and 11 female) of different ages (19.0±5.9yrs) and performance levels (400m personal best 1.38±0.13m·s-1, FINA points 490±118) completed an incremental step test (+0.03m·s-1 every 3min) to determine speed at 4mmol·L-1 and at modified maximal distance method, a LM test, a RLT test and two to five 30min tests (±0.015m·s-1) to determine MLSS. …”

Yenen, E., Atamturk, H., Atamturk, N. “…More specifically, the Mann Whitney U test results revealed that the athletes` perceptions differed by gender and by being involved in team or individual sports; however, Kruskal-Wallis test revealed perceptions did not differ by age. …”

Tessitore, A. “…It impacts on the performance through two dimensions: individual solutions generated in the moment of the action (reading the play) and collective strategy (pre]deterined solutions). …”

Mouchet, A., Duffy, P. “…This variety of statements revealed individual "coaching styles", adaptation to specific contexts, personal points of view and the importance of previous experiences in match coaching situations. …”

Zharkih, A. A., Dazmarov, N. M., Gursky, A. V., Smirnov, S. N., Arkanov, Yu. M. “…The article deals with the interrelation of expressiveness of individual and typological features - emotionality, stan chest, sensitivity, extraversion, spontaneity, rigidity, uneasiness with different failures of psychological character: withdrawal reactions, increase of conflictness, affective reactions, stupor status, activity disorganization, "flight in a disease" and also with the probability of achievement of high sports qualification, and ability to be mobilized during the responsible competitions.…”

Kieffer, E. E. “…Concussions are diffuse injuries that affect areas of the brain responsible for a person`s physical, cognitive, and emotional health. …”

Lozovoy, A. A.

Deshpande, S. P., Vaidya, D. P., Wankhada, N. V. “…Every human being is different and therefore personalization is required in every aspect. …”

Di Onofrio, V., Montesano, P., Mazzeo, F. “…Coaching can understand as the process in which individuals, mostly athletes, supported for their improvement and development in order to achieve performance high levels. 40 adults, aged between 35 and 45 years old, practicing football at amateur level for eight months, belonging to two different sports groups (blue and red group), have been observed. …”

Collins, J. “…The Optimal Team Functioning (OTF) model was inductively created to outline key attributes (N=4) and processes (N=17) deemed necessary by high performance curling coaches and athletes for optimal functioning within different contexts. The model comprises eight components under which attributes and processes are grouped: (a) Individual Attributes, (b) Team Attributes, (c) Foundational Process of Communication, (d) Structural Team Processes, (e) Individual Regulation Processes, (f) Team Regulation Processes, (g) Context, and (h) Desired Outcomes. …”