Sinclair, J, Edmundson, C. J. & Bentley, I. (2022). The efficacy of repetitions-in-reserve vs. traditional percentage-based resistance training: A 4-week pre-season randomized intervention in elite rugby league players. Sport Sciences for Health, 18 (2), 525-535. Zugriff am 23.12.2022 unter https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-021-00837-5
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Sinclair, J., Edmundson, C. J., & Bentley, I. (2022). The efficacy of repetitions-in-reserve vs. traditional percentage-based resistance training: A 4-week pre-season randomized intervention in elite rugby league players. Sport Sciences for Health, 18(2), 525-535.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Sinclair, J., C. J. Edmundson, und I. Bentley. "The Efficacy of Repetitions-in-reserve Vs. Traditional Percentage-based Resistance Training: A 4-week Pre-season Randomized Intervention in Elite Rugby League Players." Sport Sciences for Health 18, no. 2 (2022): 525-535.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Sinclair, J., et al. "The Efficacy of Repetitions-in-reserve Vs. Traditional Percentage-based Resistance Training: A 4-week Pre-season Randomized Intervention in Elite Rugby League Players." Sport Sciences for Health, vol. 18, no. 2, 2022, pp. 525-535.