Background: The dynamic exertion test (EXiT) was developed to help inform return to play after sport-related concussion, but some factors may threaten the internal validity of EXiT and affect clinical interpretation. Objective: To compare age, sex, BMI, and sport types across EXiT physiological [pre-EXiT and post-EXiT percentage of maximum heart rate (HR_%max) and blood pressure (BP)], performance (change-of-direction task completion time and committed errors), and clinical [symptoms and rating of perceived exertion (RPE)] outcomes among healthy adolescents and adults. Study design: Cross-sectional. Methods: Eighty-seven participants (F = 55, 37.4%) reported symptoms and RPE during the EXiT, which consists of a 12-minute treadmill running protocol, and the dynamic circuit, ball toss, box shuffle (SHUF) and carioca (CAR), zig zag (ZZ), proagility (PA), and arrow agility (AA) tasks. Independent samples t tests were conducted for pre-EXiT and post-EXiT HR_%max and BP and change-of-direction task completion time and Mann-Whitney U tests for errors, symptoms, and RPE. A series of 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVAs) and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were conducted to compare collision, contact, and noncontact sport types. Results: Adolescents had lower completion time across AA (P = 0.01) and male athletes lower than female athletes on CAR, ZZ, PA, and AA (P < 0.04). Male athletes reported greater RPE after the SHUF, CAR, and AA (P < 0.03). HR_%max, errors, and symptoms were equivocal across all subgroups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Age and sex should be considered in the interpretation of performance and clinical, but not physiological, EXiT outcomes. The EXiT is a standardized exercise assessment and generalizable to healthy athletes.
© Copyright 2022 Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. All rights reserved.