Editorial Hossner (Ed.): Quiet Eye research - Joan Vickers on target .. CISS_2016.100 Main Article Vickers: Origins and current issues in Quiet Eye research ...................................................................................CISS_2016.101 Commentaries Baker & Wattie: Sssh! We`re talking about the Quiet Eye - comment on Vickers ...................................................CISS_2016.102 Causer: The future of Quiet Eye research - comment on Vickers ......................................................................... CISS_2016.103 Davids & Araujo: What could an ecological dynamics rationale offer Quiet Eye research? Comment on Vickers ... ..CISS_2016.104 Farrow & Panchuk: Using Quiet Eye training in an elite sport context - comment on Vickers . .........................CISS_2016.105 Foulsham: Functions of a quiet and un-quiet eye in natural tasks - comment on Vickers .........................................CISS_2016.106 Frank & Schack: In my mind`s (quiet) eye: a perceptual-cognitive approach to the Quiet Eye - comment on Vickers .CISS_2016.107 Gegenfurtner & Szulewski: Visual expertise and the Quiet Eye in sports - comment on Vickers .. ...........................CISS_2016.108 Helsen, Levin, Ziv, & Davare: Is a `quiet eye` all it takes to be successful? Comment on Vickers ................ .............CISS_2016.109 Klostermann, Vater & Kredel: Tackling Quiet Eye issues on a functional level - comment on Vickers. ................... CISS_2016.110 Mann, Wright & Janelle: Quiet Eye: The efficiency paradox - comment on Vickers .................................................CISS_2016.111 Rodrigues & Navarro: What information is being acquired during the period of Quiet Eye? Comment on Vickers CISS_2016.112 Schorer, Tirp & Rienhoff: Quiet Eye: The next generation - comment on Vickers .....................................................CISS_2016.113 Spering & Schütz: How eye movements improve vision and action - comment on Vickers ................................. ..CISS_2016.114 Watson & Enns: The Quiet Eye in life and lab - comment on Vickers .....................................................................CISS_2016.115 Williams: Quiet eye vs. noisy brain: The eye like the brain is always active -comment on Vickers .............CISS_2016.116 Wilson, Wood & Vine: Say it quietly, but we still do not know how Quiet Eye training works - comment on Vickers ....CISS_2016.117 Response Vickers: The Quiet Eye: Reply to sixteen commentaries ...................................................... ..................................CISS_2016.118 In this target article (TA; CISS2016_100), Joan Vickers gives an overview of 20 years of research on her discovery that a relatively long lasting fixation before movement initiation enhances complex-motor performance, the so-called Quiet Eye (QE) phenomenon. Vickers` main article (CISS2016_101) is the focus of sixteen peer commentaries (CISS2016_102 - CISS2016_117), authored by sport scientists with a special focus on the QE (Causer; Farrow & Panchuk; Klostermann, Vater & Kredel; Mann, Wright & Janelle; Schorer, Tirp & Rienhoff; Williams; Wilson, Wood & Vine), by sport scientists with different research foci (Baker & Wattie; Davids & Araujo; Frank & Schack; Helsen, Levin, Ziv & Davare; Rodrigues & Navarro), and by experts in human perception from disciplines beyond sport science (Foulsham; Gegenfurtner & Szulewski; Spering & Schütz; Watson & Enns). Finally, critiques, suggestions, and extensions brought forward by the commentators are acknowledged by Vickers in her closing response (CISS2016_118).
© Copyright 2016 Current Issues in Sport Science. Österreichische Sportwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft. All rights reserved.