An implicit basis for the retention benefits of random practice

The cognitive effort explanations of contextual interference (CI) and implicit motor learning represent a paradox in which cognitive involvement is seen to be advantageous or disadvantageous for learning. The authors aimed to resolve this paradox by measuring cognitive effort and working memory dependence during low and high CI practice on two Australian Rules Football tasks (kicking and handball). Measures of cognitive effort included: kicking and handball outcome performance during acquisition and during a test of retention, performance on a probe reaction time task during a sample of acquisition trials, and self-reported levels of cognitive effort. Measures of implicit and explicit learning included kicking and handball performance during a secondary task transfer, and self-report verbal protocols (number of verbal rules and hypotheses reported). The results suggest that high CI may cause an implicit mode of learning, perhaps due to the interference caused by task switching. However, these findings are restricted to the more complex of the 2 tasks (kicking).
© Copyright 2011 Journal of Motor Behavior. Taylor & Francis, Heldref Publications. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details
Subjects:
Notations:biological and medical sciences social sciences sport games
Tagging:Transfer
Published in:Journal of Motor Behavior
Language:English
Published: 2011
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2010.530304
Volume:43
Issue:1
Pages:1-13
Document types:article
Level:advanced