DVS Edition Citation

Helsen, W. F., Gilis, B & Weston, M. (2006). Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25 (9), 991-994. doi: 10.1080/02640410601150488

APA (7th ed.) Citation

Helsen, W. F., Gilis, B., & Weston, M. (2006). Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(9), 991-994.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Helsen, W. F., B. Gilis, and M. Weston. "Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) Do Not Err in Questioning the Optical Error Hypothesis as the Only Major Account for Explaining Offside Decision-making Errors." Journal of Sports Sciences 25, no. 9 (2006): 991-994.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Helsen, W. F., et al. "Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) Do Not Err in Questioning the Optical Error Hypothesis as the Only Major Account for Explaining Offside Decision-making Errors." Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 25, no. 9, 2006, pp. 991-994.