Helsen, W. F., Gilis, B & Weston, M. (2006). Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25 (9), 991-994. doi: 10.1080/02640410601150488
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Helsen, W. F., Gilis, B., & Weston, M. (2006). Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(9), 991-994.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Helsen, W. F., B. Gilis, und M. Weston. "Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) Do Not Err in Questioning the Optical Error Hypothesis as the Only Major Account for Explaining Offside Decision-making Errors." Journal of Sports Sciences 25, no. 9 (2006): 991-994.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Helsen, W. F., et al. "Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) Do Not Err in Questioning the Optical Error Hypothesis as the Only Major Account for Explaining Offside Decision-making Errors." Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 25, no. 9, 2006, pp. 991-994.