Physical demands and performance indicators in male professional cyclists during a grand tour: WorldTour versus ProTeam category
Purpose:
To compare the physical demands and performance indicators of male professional cyclists of 2 different categories (Union Cycliste Internationale WorldTour [WT] and ProTeam [PT]) during a cycling grand tour.
Methods:
A WT team (n = 8, 31.4 [5.4] y) and a PT team (n = 7, 26.9 [3.3] y) that completed "La Vuelta 2020" volunteered to participate. Participants` power output (PO) was registered, and measures of physical demand and physiological performance (kilojoules spent, training stress score, time spent at different PO bands/zones, and mean maximal PO [MMP] for different exertion durations) were computed.
Results:
WT achieved a higher final individual position than PT (31 [interquartile range = 33] vs 71 [59], P = .004). WT cyclists showed higher mean PO and kilojoule values than their PT peers and spent more time at high-intensity PO values (>5.25 W·kg-1) and zones (91%-120% of individualized functional threshold power) (Ps < .05). Although no differences were found for MMP values in the overall analysis (P > .05), subanalyses revealed that the between-groups gap increased through the race, with WT cyclists reaching higher MMP values for =5-minute efforts in the second and third weeks (Ps < .05).
Conclusions:
Despite the multifactorial nature of cycling performance, WT cyclists spend more time at high intensities and show higher kilojoules and mean PO than their PT referents during a grand tour. Although the highest MMP values attained during the whole race might not differentiate between WT and PT cyclists, the former achieve higher MMP values as the race progresses.
© Copyright 2022 International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. All rights reserved.
| Subjects: | |
|---|---|
| Notations: | endurance sports |
| Tagging: | Etappenrennen |
| Published in: | International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2022
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2021-0082 |
| Volume: | 17 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Pages: | 22-30 |
| Document types: | article |
| Level: | advanced |