Hebisz, R, Hebisz, P, Zaton, M & Michalik, K. (2017). Peak oxygen uptake in a sprint interval testing protocol vs. maximal oxygen uptake in an incremental testing protocol and their relationship with cross-country mountain biking performance. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 42 (4), 371-376. Zugriff am 05.07.2017 unter https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2016-0362
APA (7th ed.) CitationHebisz, R., Hebisz, P., Zaton, M., & Michalik, K. (2017). Peak oxygen uptake in a sprint interval testing protocol vs. maximal oxygen uptake in an incremental testing protocol and their relationship with cross-country mountain biking performance. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 42(4), 371-376.
Chicago Style (17th ed.) CitationHebisz, R., P. Hebisz, M. Zaton, and K. Michalik. "Peak Oxygen Uptake in a Sprint Interval Testing Protocol Vs. Maximal Oxygen Uptake in an Incremental Testing Protocol and Their Relationship with Cross-country Mountain Biking Performance." Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 42, no. 4 (2017): 371-376.
MLA (9th ed.) CitationHebisz, R., et al. "Peak Oxygen Uptake in a Sprint Interval Testing Protocol Vs. Maximal Oxygen Uptake in an Incremental Testing Protocol and Their Relationship with Cross-country Mountain Biking Performance." Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, vol. 42, no. 4, 2017, pp. 371-376.