The aim of this study was to compare the physiological and psychological responses of cyclists riding on a hard tail bicycle and on a full suspension bicycle. Twenty males participated in two series of tests. A test rig held the front axle of the bicycle steady while the rear wheel rotated against a heavy roller with bumps (or no bumps) on its surface. In the first series of tests, eight participants (age 19 - 27 years, body mass 65 - 82 kg) were tested on both the full suspension and hard tail bicycles with and without bumps fitted to the roller. The second series of test repeated the bump tests with a further six participants (age 22 - 31 years, body mass 74 - 94 kg) and also involved an investigation of familiarization effects with the final six participants (age 21 - 30 years, body mass 64 - 80 kg). Heart rate, oxygen consumption (&Vdot;O2), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and comfort were recorded during 10 min sub-maximal tests. Combined data for the bumps tests show that the full suspension bicycle was significantly different (P < 0.001) from the hard tail bicycle on all four measures. Oxygen consumption, heart rate and RPE were lower on average by 8.7 (s = 3.6) ml · kg-1 · min-1, 32.1 (s = 12.1) beats · min-1 and 2.6 (s = 2.0) units, respectively. Comfort scores were higher (better) on average by 1.9 (s = 0.8) units. For the no bumps tests, the only statistically significant difference (P = 0.008) was in &Vdot;O2, which was lower for the hard tail bicycle by 2.2 (s = 1.7) ml · kg-1 · min-1. The results indicate that the full suspension bicycle provides a physiological and psychological advantage over the hard tail bicycle during simulated sub-maximal exercise on bumps.
© Copyright 2006 Journal of Sports Sciences. Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved.